|
|
|
More About the Virtual Space Concept

History - On the shoulders of Open Space
Let us begin with some history.
It is now more than 20 years since conference-organizer Harrison Owen
discovered that more was accomplished on the coffee breaks than in the
sessions he had created. His response was to create Open Space Technology
(Owen, 1997) - essentially a series of 'coffee breaks' instead of rigid
meetings. Open Space is a superb tool for empowering a group to create
and control a potentially challenging dialogue, and exponentially increase
its effectiveness. The founding principles of Open Space are deceptively
simple:
 |
Whoever comes are the right people.
|
 |
Whatever happens is the only thing that could have happened.
|
 |
Whenever it starts is the right time.
|
 |
When it’s over, it’s over. |
While to the uninitiated, Open
Space often sounds like a recipe for chaos and anarchy, the tool has a
huge worldwide following, and, at one extreme, was even used to design the
Boeing 777 aircraft, (reportedly to great acclaim). Still, it is more of
a meeting format than a conference format. Open Space lacks the structure
required for attendees to explore multiple complete workshops with more
clearly defined ‘presenters’ (or facilitators).
Reference: Owen,
H.(1997). Open Space Technology: A User’s Guide. (2nd ed.)
San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler.
NCCPS – a
Conference Adaptation
In 1992/93, Tom Leahy created the American
National Challenge Course
Practitioners Symposium in Boulder Colorado, an
annual event that continues to have great success. The format for the NCCPS
is Virtual Space (or V-Space to its disciples), not to be confused with
the internet-based concept of the same name. I'll let him describe
it:
"Virtual Space is an incredible meeting
technology. Ward Flynn of the Venture Center of Colorado experimented
with the Open Space concept of Harrison Owen and gave it a very
practical twist. In this evolution, V-Space allows for both traditional
prepared workshops and it allows for passion and spontaneity when
practitioners come together and realize that a need or opportunity has
presented itself. V-Space creates the structure that allows practitioners
to gather what they need when they realize the moment." -
Tom Leahy
V-Space is so true to the
principles of adult education and facilitated learning, that I am still
amazed that more conferences are not run this way (although the list is
beginning to grow). Here's how Tom describes the NCCPS V-Space
experience:
"NCCPS is an uncommon gathering. As a
participant in NCCPS, you will take an active role in your own learning
and you will be asked to share your knowledge with others. At NCCPS,
all participants are equals. First time attendees and
multi-year alumni work together to create an environment of safety and
learning. Imagine a conference in which you not only feel welcomed,
but one in which politics and judgments are left at the door... where
there is no such thing as a stupid question... where high school students
teach a meaningful workshop to adults and where everyone freely shares
what they know. You will have tremendous power and responsibility to
make sure everyone gets the learning they need. No one who takes
responsibility for their own learning at NCCPS ever leaves disappointed!
Just ask any alumnus.
Virtual Space?? At a traditional conference, who chooses the
workshops? A committee. At NCCPS, all of the participants are
on the committee. With the structure of Virtual Space, we sort
through the ideas together. Passionate professionals, who have never
even thought of presenting before, realize that their talent, skills and
experience benefit the field. People just entering the field find
they can ask the many talented professionals around them to share.
NCCPS gives everyone a chance to develop their skills, to ask their
questions and to request the materials they need.
NCCPS is the epitome of making the learner responsible for his/her own
learning. Virtual Space is the structure that turns potential chaos
into a symphony of talent and fulfillment. Our alumni are the glue
that holds it all together, the grease that keeps it moving...they are the
fuel. And first time participants, when they realize the potential
of NCCPS...they are the flame. Everyone who attends brings his or
her own passion for what we do. NCCPS is about learning,
facilitation, and experiential education." - Tom Leahy
Excited yet? Now imagine all
of that in your own backyard! That is what CEEPS is all about.
We were weaned at NCCPS and are experts at the Virtual Space process.
(Read about an interesting anecdote from their 2003
gathering.) In fact, we have even created our own small enhancements!
Read on...
|
Traditional |
Virtual Space |
Advantage |
|
Workshops are created by
presenters, submitted to a committee, and accepted or rejected (often
up to a year in advance). |
There is no advance agenda.
Some workshops are prepared ahead of time by presenters, others are
created in the moment. Any attendee can create a session and have it
included as an offering.
|
There is no committee making
decisions for the participants as to what learning will be offered.
Sessions can also respond in the moment to the immediate needs of the
attendees. |
|
All sessions presented by
formally accepted presenters – often from a narrow field of ‘experts’
or those who have presented in the past. |
Any participant can create a
session. It might be a presentation, or a discussion, and they are
not obligated to have the answers – just the desire to have the
session offered. |
Powerful sessions happen when
people who would never consider themselves ‘experts’ take a lead and
champion a workshop where everyone can share their knowledge and
experience on a level playing field.
|
|
Sessions are usually selected
partially on the basis of broad appeal to sufficient attendees to make
the offering ‘worthwhile’. |
With a virtually unlimited
number of concurrent sessions, it is quite acceptable to have as few
as two participants gathering to create a workshop or discussion.
|
The importance of the topic to
the individuals present drives the process, not the estimated mass appeal. |
|
If the learning an attendee
wants is not offered, too bad. If two desired sessions overlap, too
bad. |
Any participant can create
their own session around a need or request a session to be created
that would provide the learning they want. The most powerful sessions
are often initiated this way. Anyone can also ask presenters to
re-arrange time slots or offer sessions again to correct personal
schedule overlaps.
|
Each and every participant is
directly responsible for (and in control of) their learning outcomes.
If the desire for a particular session is shared, it will be created.
Also, the opportunity exists to tailor the time slots of concurrent
sessions so that many more people can attend they sessions that they
want. |
|
Workshops have an implicit
obligation to impart formal knowledge; most have at least some lecture
component. |
In addition to presentations
and discussions, sessions entirely devoted to engaging participants in
sharing and playing activities are encouraged. |
For experiential education
this is not only a case of practicing what we teach, it also gives
conference attendees hands-on time with new activities and renewed
energy for tackling the more formal learning segments.
|
|
If a participant chooses to
attend a workshop and subsequently discovers that the session is not
really what they were looking for, there is a polite obligation to sit
it out and only kick themselves for their poor selection.
|
One of the principles of Open
Space and V-Space is the “Law of 2 Feet”: If the session is not what
you need, you are encouraged to move on and find another that is. |
The participant is responsible
for their own learning, and is expected to be proactive in making sure
those needs are met. Leaving an inappropriate session also prevents
the inclination to try to change that session at the expense of the
other attendees. |
Virtual Space is a wonderful format, but we were
suffering from one thing that traditional conferences offer:
Pre-announced speakers and workshops are a lot more attractive to those
unfamiliar to V-Space, and a lot easier to sell to decision-makers who
determine who to send to what conferences.
We solved that problem by creating our
Enhanced Virtual Space format. We specifically invite a core of
industry experts to prepare presentations, and we announce these ahead of
time. Those presentations are then placed on our V-Space time slot
grid ahead of time as Prepared Presentations (usually 2 hours in length).
(The prepared sessions of typical V-Space symposiums are not
announced in advance).
The rest of the V-Space sessions are filled in as
before, with participants announcing, requesting, and creating topics
on-site at the symposium.
Still have questions? Perhaps you'll find
the answer by clicking here.
Otherwise, please contact us directly!

A Virtual Space Case History
- February 2003
Hi. I just got back from the 11th annual National Challenge
Course Practitioners Symposium in Boulder, Colorado. At their Virtual Space kick-off, Tom Leahy, the conference host, called for the attendees with prepared
workshops to step forward, write their topic on an orange piece of paper, and
announce their topics, as he does every year. This
year there were fewer prepared presenters than usual (perhaps 15 instead of the
usual 25). He decided on-the-spot to formalize the other half of the Virtual
Space concept:
He called for attendees with needs (not addressed by the
prepared sessions already announced) to identify their desired topics on a white
piece of paper and present them to the group. In no time at all, 20 people
stood where the presenters had just been, and described the learning that they had
come for. Tom next asked for people who could address those needs to create
a workshop for the others. When he then repeated the call for presenters, the
ranks had swelled, everyone's needs were being met, and the conference
was underway!
Andrew Welch
Back to Top
|
Up
Contents (c) Copyright 2004-2005, Andrew Welch. This page was last updated
April 19, 2006
|